Posts

中山大学农革的博士生因拒索贿被私刑退学(文字版)

Image
上方视频为本文的视频版 中山大学农革索贿事件校方五毛列表 https://joice159753.blogspot.com/2021/09/blog-post.html 关键字: 遭遇索贿,符合毕业条件,暗箱操作、违规退学,农革 事件速览: 中山大学计算机学院农革老师的博士生,因拒索贿,被拖满七年,并在满足毕业条件的情况下,于第八年被以完全私刑的方式操作退学。 相关细节有: 1、毕业论文外审全程处于暗箱,拒绝我本人填写和查看任何外审相关信息。 2、退学流程,无公文,无公示,被校方通过私下渠道修改学信网信息操作退学。 3、农革老师关键论文涉抄袭,并有大量应用性的论文是建立在抄袭的论文之上。[1] 4、校方自始至终一直回避该事件(索贿、抄袭、失职、外审暗箱、违规操作退学)。 我是中山大学数据科学与计算机学院农革老师的2012级全日制纯博士生,也是他的第一级博士生,非直博,非硕博连读。 2012年9月入学后的最初几个月,**老师多次找我谈话,向我暗示索贿,但我无经济实力满足其要求。导致在整个读博期间,我被完全孤立无任何科研指导,在有国家针对每个博士生给予培养经费的情况下,我没有任何经费和设备支持。 此处,有无给予科研指导?农革老师如果有异议,可提供会议记录等相关信息;有无经费支持?农革老师如果有异议,可以提供学校系统的往来账目;有无设备支持?农革老师如果有异议,有账目可以提供账目,没有账目提供照片也行。 暗示索贿录音如下:(某些网络可能需要科学上网才能更快打开) https://app.degoo.com/share/KLnFWEFXKXG1g2 https://app.degoo.com/share/uZlC3bfkjaEU6b 2019年是我读博的第七年,我的学术成果已经达到学校和学院的毕业要求。学院的审核认定录音可以证明: https://app.degoo.com/share/9d5Yl6Kiu1zgxq 但所有的流程材料农革老师拒绝签字,同时还对学院进行捆绑,阻止我的论文外审。学院相关负责人的谈话录音可以证明: https://app.degoo.com/share/RFx1Ceovof5zdD 录音大致内容如下:     “之前几次谈话,农老师提到:现在不管是学院,老师压力也很大,学院压力也很大,教育部对论文把关非常严格,如果论文质量抽...

中山大学农革的博士生因拒索贿被私刑退学(视频版)

Image
中山大学农革索贿事件校方五毛列表 https://joice159753.blogspot.com/2021/09/blog-post.html

对中山大学计算机学院农革老师17篇论文涉抄袭的论证

Image
上方视频从6分40秒开始为本文的视频版 中山大学农革索贿事件校方五毛列表 https://joice159753.blogspot.com/2021/09/blog-post.html 论证步骤: 1、抄袭涉及的关键论文; 2、抄袭的认定依据; 3、关键论文技术细节分析; 4、对关键论文涉抄袭的论证; 5、对其他大量论文涉抄袭的论证。 1、抄袭涉及的关键论文 农革老师这篇关键论文的题目是: https://google-code-archive-downloads.storage.googleapis.com/v2/code.google.com/ge-nong/Two%20Efficient%20Algorithms%20for%20Linear%20Time%20Suffix%20Array%20Construction.pdf   对应的国外论文的题目是:Space Efficient Linear Time Construction of Suffix Arrays  下载地址: http://alumni.cs.ucr.edu/~rakthant/cs234/03_KA_Simple%20Linear%20Work%20Suffix%20Array%20Construction.pdf   为了陈述方便,本材料把农革老师的这篇关键论文简称为:论文A;国外论文简称为:论文B。本材料首先论证论文A抄袭论文B,然后论证与论文A相关的16篇(截止2021年7月)论文涉抄袭。  2、抄袭的认定依据 很遗憾无法从网络搜索找到,中山大学对论文抄袭的严格界定。此处只能借用较为通用的《国家版权局版权管理司关于如何认定抄袭行为给某某市版权局的答复》,文号:权司[1999]第6号 (见: https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E8%AE%BA%E6%96%87%E6%8A%84%E8%A2%AD/1553223#4 )。其中有这么一段:  二、从抄袭的形式看,有原封不动或者基本原封不动地复制他人作品的行为,也有经改头换面后将他人受著作权保护的独创成份窃为己有的行为,前者在著作权执法领域被称为低级抄袭,后者被称为高级抄袭。低级抄袭的认定比较容易。高级抄袭需经过认真辨别,甚至需经过专家鉴定后方能认定。在著作权...

This paper involves plagiarism

Paper A ( Two efficient algorithms for linear time suffix array construction ) is the main research field of Pro. Ge Nong ( issng@mail.sysu.edu.cn , Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 中山大学). It is also his first paper in this field. Sequent papers relevant of him are all based on this one. Paper B is  Space Efficient Linear Time Construction of Suffix Arrays . Paper A is found plagiarizing paper B.  Years ago, there were analyses by the researchers in the same field. See Suffix Array Construction: KA’s algorithm and Induced Sorting, which is faster? It gives a very polite comment in English after analysis. And 最好写的suffix tree(suffix array)算法? The analysis in Chinese points out that the idea and logic of the algorithm (Setcion III. ALGORITHM I: INDUCED SORTING VARIABLE-LENGTH LMS-SUBSTRINGS, Page 3~8) in Pro. Ge Nong’s paper A are the same as the algorithm of paper B. This content is an extra information of  What is your view of researching at 中山大学 (Sun Yat-Sen Unive...

Researching at 中山大学 (Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou) as a PhD for 7 years, meeting the requirement of graduation, but being dropt out by the university in the end just because of not meeting the professor’s bribe demand

I started my Ph.D. program at the school of data and computer science, Sun Yat-sen University(SYSU, Guanzhou), in 2012. Student ID:12110646. I am one of the first batch  Ph.D. students(total 2) of Pro. Ge Nong (issng@mail.sysu.edu.cn). In 2012, after I entered into SYSU, Pro. ** talked to me times implying bribe demand, no avail. Then, I had to research alone for 7 years and must be close to his research field according to the clauses of the university, no direction, no advice, no machine, no support even there is national funding provided to the supervisor for each PhD student. In Apr. 2019, in the case of meeting the requirement of graduation, my last chance to apply for the degree, Pro. Ge Nong refused to sign relevant documents. And the local police station was asked to treat me as a concerned-object after my complaint to the department head. Later in Apr. 2019, I complained to the President's Office and the Office of Government Ethics of the university, then my thesis wa...